About Me & This Website
My Positions
On Facebook
Contact Me

Articles
  An Appeal for Principles
  America's Titanic Moment
  Truth about Soc. Sec.
  Clinton Surplus Myth
  Taxes, Rich & Poor
  Clinton Surplus Myth, Pt. 2
  Financial Crisis
  Obama's Economy
  More articles...

Latest News Feed
  High Honors: Living Soldi...
  US aims to fulfill Obama ...
  Former Indiana Secretary ...
  Voter fraud verdict 'a tr...
  Upcoming states could ser...
  Egypt to prosecute 44 wor...
  More Headlines

U.S. National Debt
  
  Total: $15.351 trillion
  This Month: $4.7 billion
  Last Month: $133.2 billion
  This FY: $561.1 billion
  Obama: $4.725 trillion
  As of: 02/02/2012

Federal Reserve Balance
  

Videos
  Live: U.S. Senate
  Live: U.S. House
  America's Marines

Some Humor
  Time for Campaignin'

It's Official! Recession Redefined   December 1st, 2008
We've now "officially" been in a recession since Dec. 2007... even though the economy was growing       

 
QUICK OBSERVATIONS

More observations...
 

Even though a recession is commonly defined as two consecutive quarters of decrease in the GDP , it is now "official" that we've been in a recession since December 2007... even though GDP hasn't decreased for two consecutive quarters yet.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/01/news/economy/recession/index.htm

The National Bureau of Economic Research said Monday that the U.S. has been in a recession since December 2007, making official what most Americans have already believed about the state of the economy...

"The committee views the payroll employment measure, which is based on a large survey of employers, as the most reliable comprehensive estimate of employment," said the group's statement. "This series reached a peak in December 2007 and has declined every month since then."


And from the National Bureau of Economic Research itself: http://wwwdev.nber.org/dec2008.html

The committee determined that the decline in economic activity in 2008 met the standard for a recession, as set forth in the second paragraph of this document. All evidence other than the ambiguous movements of the quarterly product-side measure of domestic production confirmed that conclusion.


It seems to me that there really isn't any hard and fast rule as to what constitutes a recession anymore--it's an ambiguous event that begins when some arbitrary group of people subjectively decides that it happens. Apparently, since we were a year into what these people wanted to call a recession but we had "ambiguous" movements in the GDP that wouldn't technically qualify as a recession, they just declared a recession based on other factors--even though those factors really aren't what traditionally define a recession. So I guess we just redefine the terms so we can call it a recession now.

The media is certainly happy to see this. They've been predicting a recession for, what, two years now? Finally, according to this declaration, they've been vindicated. I guess if you predict something long enough you will eventually be right. Especially if you redefine the terms.

EDIT: Two days after I posted this comment, I stumbled upon this commentary that really highlights the arbitrary (and somewhat suspicious) declaration of a recession as of December 2007. Definitely read this link!

 Go to the article list